Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Red Bull

brand · X @redbullqatar (review) · from the Red Bull × Axwell thesis →

Also pointed here by Dada Life (WATCH 0.70), Tanked (WATCH 0.59), Running Wild with Bear Grylls (WATCH 0.58)

Why this side

Red Bull is the one to approach because it is a brand with a verified public contact route, and the facts suggest its audience already strongly likes the target. Axwell is kept as evidence only because he is an individual artist whose public contact route is not verified yet.

never contactedAxwell (artist) is evidence only.

0.92
Axwell fans → Red Bull
0.92
Red Bull fans → Axwell
Pair score0.75PITCH

Who the audience is

Red Bull audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.05
25–29-0.03
30–34+0.04
35–44+0.07
45–54+0.01
55+-0.64

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ Las Vegas◎ San Diego

Red Bull's strongest US cities

AnaheimLas VegasSan DiegoDenverRiverside

Taste the two audiences share

electronichousefriendtechnodanceminimaltranceelectrodeep housefriendship

Three more partners Qloo found for Red Bull

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Red Bull fans → partner; back = partner fans → Red Bull.

The ChallengeTV show
out 0.94back 0.97
Dada Lifeartist
out 0.93back 0.99
The Island with Bear GryllsTV show
out 0.94back 0.91

Outreach

6 found, 2 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.