Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Iope

brand · from the Iope × Jennie thesis →

Why this side

Iope is the one to approach about Qloo's audience data because it is a brand or studio with a verified public contact route and its other audience already likes it strongly. Jennie is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist where the buyer would be a label or management, and her public contact route is not verified yet.

never contactedJennie (artist) is evidence only.

0.91
Jennie fans → Iope
0.94
Iope fans → Jennie
Pair score0.92PITCH

Who the audience is

Iope audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.81
25–29-0.20
30–34+0.64
35–44+0.06
45–54-0.50
55+0.00

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ Honolulu◎ San Francisco◎ Los Angeles◎ New York◎ Buffalo◎ Seattle◎ San Jose◎ Anaheim

Iope's strongest US cities

New YorkLos AngelesHonoluluSan FranciscoLas VegasAnaheimSeattleLong Beach

Taste the two audiences share

health & beautyactorkdramak popkorean dramalovekpopkoreansouth koreamurderlive action adaptationkorea

Three more partners Qloo found for Iope

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Iope fans → partner; back = partner fans → Iope.

Outreach

2 found, 1 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.