Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Eastman Kodak

brand · X @kodak (verified) · from the Eastman Kodak × A24 thesis →

Also pointed here by A24 (WATCH 0.71)

Why this side

Eastman Kodak is the side to approach about Qloo's audience data because they have a verified public contact route and their audience already likes it strongly. A24 is kept as evidence only because their audience likes it moderately despite also having a verified public contact route.

never contactedA24 (brand) is evidence only.

0.88
A24 fans → Eastman Kodak
0.88
Eastman Kodak fans → A24
Pair score0.72WATCH

Who the audience is

Eastman Kodak audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.18
25–29-0.04
30–34+0.18
35–44+0.02
45–54-0.49
55+-0.63

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ Los Angeles◎ San Francisco◎ New York

Eastman Kodak's strongest US cities

San FranciscoLos AngelesNew York

Taste the two audiences share

indieindie rockfemale protagonistalternative rocksurrealismfilmmakerlesbianelectronicfilmmakersfriendshipmusicianrock

Three more partners Qloo found for Eastman Kodak

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Eastman Kodak fans → partner; back = partner fans → Eastman Kodak.

SAULTartist
out 0.93back 0.84
Kiasmosartist
out 0.93back 0.80
King Kruleartist
out 0.94back 0.80

Outreach

2 found, 2 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.