The buyer
Duolingo
brand · X @duolingo (verified) · from the Duolingo × Tumblr thesis →
Also pointed here by Stephen Fry in America (WATCH 0.58)
Why this side
Duolingo is the right side to approach about Qloo audience data because their target audience already demonstrates strong enthusiasm for it and they have a verified public contact route. Tumblr is kept as evidence only because their audience shows a more moderate level of existing affinity, which suggests they are better suited to support the primary outreach.
never contactedTumblr (brand) is evidence only.
Who the audience is
Duolingo audience by age
■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline
Where
Cities where both audiences are strong
Duolingo's strongest US cities
Taste the two audiences share
Three more partners Qloo found for Duolingo
The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Duolingo fans → partner; back = partner fans → Duolingo.
Outreach
5 found, 1 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →
Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.