Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Dolce & Gabbana

brand · X @dolcegabbana (verified) · from the Dolce & Gabbana × Charli XCX thesis →

Why this side

Dolce & Gabbana is the one to approach about Qloo's audience data because it is a brand with a verified public contact route. Charli XCX is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist with a contact route that is not verified yet.

never contactedCharli XCX (artist) is evidence only.

0.93
Charli XCX fans → Dolce & Gabbana
0.89
Dolce & Gabbana fans → Charli XCX
Pair score0.76PITCH

Who the audience is

Dolce & Gabbana audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25-0.02
25–29-0.04
30–34+0.06
35–44+0.18
45–54-0.54
55+-0.63

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ New York◎ Los Angeles◎ Las Vegas◎ Washington DC◎ Orlando◎ Brooklyn

Dolce & Gabbana's strongest US cities

MiamiNew YorkLos AngelesLas VegasOrlandoBrooklynWashington DCHouston

Taste the two audiences share

female protagonistfriendshipgaymurderfriendpop

Three more partners Qloo found for Dolce & Gabbana

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Dolce & Gabbana fans → partner; back = partner fans → Dolce & Gabbana.

Shakiraartist
out 0.95back 0.96
Sex/LifeTV show
out 0.94back 0.94
BridgertonTV show
out 0.94back 0.91

Outreach

6 found, 3 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

VERIFIEDPiera Valentina Toniolo · Global Head of Influencer Marketingmessage →
VERIFIEDJennifer Ciocca · Head of Corporate Communicationsmessage →
VERIFIEDGianluca Toniolo · chief executive officer
NOT CONFIRMEDAgostino Guerra · Vice President of Communications and Public Relations
STALESimona Baroni · Global PR & Communications Director
NOT CONFIRMEDp***@dolcegabbana.it · Press and media communications

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.