Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Anova Culinary

brand · X @anovaculinary (review) · from the Anova Culinary × The Bear thesis →

Why this side

Anova Culinary is the side to approach because as a brand it directly buys audience data and matches the strong existing audience preference. The Bear is kept as evidence only because as a TV show its network would be the actual buyer and it serves merely to show that the audience already likes it.

never contactedThe Bear (TV show) is evidence only.

0.89
The Bear fans → Anova Culinary
0.89
Anova Culinary fans → The Bear
Pair score0.87PITCH

Who the audience is

Anova Culinary audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25-0.18
25–29-0.27
30–34-0.58
35–44+0.71
45–54-0.80
55+-0.52

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ San Francisco◎ Chicago

Anova Culinary's strongest US cities

San FranciscoOaklandHonoluluSan JoseSeattleLas VegasNew YorkChicago

Taste the two audiences share

restaurateurscheffoodrestaurantculinary artschefsrestaurateurchefcooking

Three more partners Qloo found for Anova Culinary

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Anova Culinary fans → partner; back = partner fans → Anova Culinary.

Outreach

2 found, 2 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.