Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

A24

brand · X @A24 (verified) · from the A24 × Julia Jacklin thesis →

Also pointed here by Yves Tumor (PITCH 0.77), Julia Jacklin (PITCH 0.75), Kidding (WATCH 0.70)

Why this side

A24 is the chosen side to approach because it is a brand with a verified public contact route, making direct outreach possible. Julia Jacklin is kept as evidence only because her audience overlap is stronger, but her contact route is not verified yet.

never contactedJulia Jacklin (artist) is evidence only.

0.79
Julia Jacklin fans → A24
0.94
A24 fans → Julia Jacklin
Pair score0.77PITCH

Who the audience is

A24 audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.30
25–29+0.35
30–34+0.24
35–44-0.66
45–54-0.47
55+-0.54

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ San Francisco◎ New York◎ Portland◎ Austin

A24's strongest US cities

Los AngelesSan FranciscoLong BeachNew YorkChicagoPortlandAlbuquerqueOakland

Taste the two audiences share

indie rockfemale protagonistlesbianfriendshipmusicianfrienddark comedyteenagerindie popnew york cityteenage girl

Three more partners Qloo found for A24

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = A24 fans → partner; back = partner fans → A24.

Soccer Mommyartist
out 0.95back 0.92
Faye Websterartist
out 0.95back 0.83
EnlightenedTV show
out 0.94back 0.83

Outreach

4 found, 1 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.